<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>StegLog - network</title>
    <link>http://blog.stegnar.com/</link>
    <description>Reflections on Software Development</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Peter Stegnar</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:52:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>peter@stegnar.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>peter@stegnar.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.stegnar.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.stegnar.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.stegnar.com/PermaLink,guid,fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Peter Stegnar</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.stegnar.com/CommentView,guid,fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.stegnar.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Sorry for the inaccessibility of the site
for a few days. In is totally unacceptable, but this is the price for running server
at home. The cause of the site outage was good old home router WBR-3406TX. It was
really old and it served well till ... the end.<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.stegnar.com/content/binary/IG010314.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
First thing in the yesterday morning I did was to order a new router. I did a little
research during the weekend which one to buy. I was totality about <a href="http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/WRT160NL">Linksys
WRT160NL</a>. It has really some nice features (USB port, detachable antennas) on
top of a powerful hardware (400Mhz CPU, for instance). I would flash it with <a href="http://www.dd-wrt.com/site/index">DD-WRT</a> firmware.<br /><br />
But in the end pragmatism won. I really need only basic routing functionality. So
I smartly picked up a <a href="http://www.mimovrste.com/artikel/1140445019/brezzicni-router-tp-link-tl-wr642g-108mb-v4">most
popular router</a> in one of the popular <a href="http://www.mimovrste.com/">Slovene
computer hardware store</a>. It is TP-Link TL-WR642G. 
<br /><br /><img src="http://blog.stegnar.com/content/binary/WR642G.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
Probably you do not know even the manufacture. Do not now worry, I did not either.
But anyway, the idea worked perfectly. I got inexpensive reliable router which do
exactly what I need and nothing more. And that is what we should always do. <b>Do
nothing more and nothing less what is necessary.</b><br /><br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.stegnar.com/aggbug.ashx?id=fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6" /></body>
      <title>Old router -&gt; New router</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stegnar.com/PermaLink,guid,fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.stegnar.com/2009/10/20/OldRouterNewRouter.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Sorry for the inaccessibility of the site for a few days. In is totally unacceptable, but this is the price for running server at home. The cause of the site outage was good old home router WBR-3406TX. It was really old and it served well till ... the end.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.stegnar.com/content/binary/IG010314.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First thing in the yesterday morning I did was to order a new router. I did a little
research during the weekend which one to buy. I was totality about &lt;a href="http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/WRT160NL"&gt;Linksys
WRT160NL&lt;/a&gt;. It has really some nice features (USB port, detachable antennas) on
top of a powerful hardware (400Mhz CPU, for instance). I would flash it with &lt;a href="http://www.dd-wrt.com/site/index"&gt;DD-WRT&lt;/a&gt; firmware.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But in the end pragmatism won. I really need only basic routing functionality. So
I smartly picked up a &lt;a href="http://www.mimovrste.com/artikel/1140445019/brezzicni-router-tp-link-tl-wr642g-108mb-v4"&gt;most
popular router&lt;/a&gt; in one of the popular &lt;a href="http://www.mimovrste.com/"&gt;Slovene
computer hardware store&lt;/a&gt;. It is TP-Link TL-WR642G. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blog.stegnar.com/content/binary/WR642G.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Probably you do not know even the manufacture. Do not now worry, I did not either.
But anyway, the idea worked perfectly. I got inexpensive reliable router which do
exactly what I need and nothing more. And that is what we should always do. &lt;b&gt;Do
nothing more and nothing less what is necessary.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.stegnar.com/aggbug.ashx?id=fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.stegnar.com/CommentView,guid,fd869311-d0ff-4ec8-b354-4ac9f588e7a6.aspx</comments>
      <category>shopping</category>
      <category>network</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>